Wednesday, February 28, 2018

WOW, Sessions Dines with Rosenstein in Show of Solidarity


Axios reports:
If Donald Trump finally follows through on his rage and fires Jeff Sessions, the image with this story will be printed in history books.
Tonight at 7:35pm, the Attorney General strode into a high-end Washington restaurant to dine with his deputy Rod Rosenstein and the Solicitor General Noel Francisco.
The symbolism was unmistakable: the three top ranking officials in the Justice Department appearing together in a show of solidarity on the same day Trump is publicly and privately raging about Sessions...
Sources close to the situation say today feels different than Trump's usual rages. Sessions' allies are deeply concerned and Trump is totally fed up with his AG.
Trump has been taunting and publicly humiliating Sessions for months now, but his tweet this morning was as rough as any he's sent:
"Why is A.G. Jeff Sessions asking the Inspector General to investigate potentially massive FISA abuse. Will take forever, has no prosecutorial power and already late with reports on Comey etc. Isn’t the I.G. an Obama guy? Why not use Justice Department lawyers? DISGRACEFUL!"
Trump is just horrible in judging personnel.

They are total cronies but Trump should have named Rudy Giuliani or Chris Christie as attorney general. There would never have been a special counsel if Giuliani or Christie were attorney general.

They would have had Trump's back.

Trump is just a street hustler, but even here his talents are very narrow and he is playing way over his league right now.

 -RW 

Agittators for Liberty

Wendell Phillips, the great agitator 


Jason Peirce emails:
RW --

Excellent points on the necessity of taking “the battle for liberty” to the intellectuals and second-hand-dealers (as you put it in “Are the Masses Intellectual Cowards?”)

This dovetails with Ron Paul’s stressing of the role of “The Agitator” in the “Slavery” chapter of his fine book “Liberty Defined.” Paul also implies the importance of not compromising -- any way -- in the battle for liberty (like say, by justifying a Trump over a Hillary).

So, what is an “Agitator”? After pointing out that modern American citizens are essentially slaves to the government, Paul discusses “The Agitator” through 19th century abolitionist Wendell Phillips:

“Phillips paid a high price for his long effort to rid the country of the scourge of slavery. Throughout all of early America he was scorned and ridiculed. He never wavered in his conviction and saw himself as an agitator and reformer whose goal was to force the American people to face the issue of slavery as a moral imperative.

Though others supported this cause, Wendell Phillips demonstrated how one individual with determination and truth on his side can influence an entire nation. His unyielding efforts based on strong beliefs in pursuing justice are an example of character rarely found in today’s society.

Wendell Phillips… should inspire anyone who seeks the plain truth about a proper political system… Phillips delivered the message and inspired the masses.

Most importantly, Wendell Phillips knew the importance of the agitator. The agitator proselytizes; he does not write the laws. The purpose of the agitator is to change people’s opinion so that great and significant social change can be achieved…

The politician tinkers around the edges while the revolutionaries – either good or evil – work to change the fundamentals of the political structure once the agitators have prepared the way.

Those who agitate for change deal with precise ideas, not fuzzy compromise. This appeals to common sense, personal conscience, and fairness. This approach is ignored when conditions seem to be stable, but when a crisis hits, the views of those who argued for change are suddenly listened to. Quiescent years can go by, requiring great patience and determination and education.”

Paul goes on to cite Cobden and Mises as agitators who helped spread ideas on how free markets benefit the masses, before concluding:

“There have been plenty of agitators and reformers for decades expecting and warning of lowering living standards brought on by regimentation of the social and economic order. They have offered the practical alternative of freedom…

I certainly agree that every so often, after long periods of apathy, when the people, driven by the architects of fear, have plunged into dependency, agitators have their day. That which has been ignored or scorned burst forward with sudden credibility and offers an alternative to the failed ideas that bred and nourished tyrannical government…

We all need to become agitators for liberty, else we end up in a permanent state of slavery.” 
 -RW 

The False Dichotomy of Having to Choose Between Trump and a Democrat in 2020

As it approaches election day 2020 it will be interesting to see how I feel about the concept of "Trump is still better than Clinton". Will Trump be better than whatever Democrat is inspired to run.. probably. 
This is a false dichotomy.  Libertarians don't have to support either. I argued during the 2016 election that that from a strategic perspective that a Hillary victory would have resulted in an easier target for libertarians to attack, and I think this has proven to be accurate. Trump has co-opted a lot of libertarians and conservatives who seeminmgly don't want to attack his many horrific positions.

You can be sure I would have had no problem in attacking the hag Hillary if she had one. And I would have plenty of libertarian help. much more than I am getting with Trump in the White House.

But please, there is really no need to support Trump in 2020 or anyone else.

In fact, my default argument here in the People's Republic of San Francisco, during the few times the 2020 election is already raised, goes something like this:
I am not supporting anyone in 2020. Whoever the candidates are they will be horrific. I'm playing a higher intellectual game aimed at the people that influence you. From our discussion, it is clear that although you don't know it, you are influenced by the Frankfurt School social philosphers. I'm trying to knock out the Frankfurt School influence so that a Private Property Society influence gains and that this influence will trickle down to you instead of Cultural Marxism.
That gets them thinking.

-RW 

TUESDAY: Democrats Flipped Two More State Legislative Seats


Two Democrats won state legislative contests Tuesday night, flipping the seats from Republican hands and marking the 38th and 39th legislative flips since President Trump's inauguration, reports The Daily Beast.

Democrat Phil Spagnuolo won a special election in New Hampshire's Belknap County District 3 on Tuesday night 968-841 (54%-46%).

 The seat was left open after the death of Republican State Rep. Donald Flanders last September. Donald Trump won the district by a sizable 54-41 margin in 2016, four years after Barack Obama carried it by just one point, 50-49.

Democrat Phil Young won a contest in Connecticut's state House District 120 as well.

The race in House District 120 was a result of a vacancy when former State Rep. Laura Hoydick, a Republican, resigned after becoming mayor of Stratford.

In the 2016 presidential election, the district voted for Hillary Clinton by a small margin 49-47, despite the fact that she beat President Trump statewide by nearly 14 points.

Trump is driving the country into the hands of Lefties. Unless there is a serious trend change, the November elections are going to be a disaster for liberty.

Thanks, "Trump for Libertarians."

-RW 

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

Finally, Something of Value From Ivanka


Ivanka Trump apparently is irritating the dangerous retired marine general and current White House Chief-of-Staff, John Kelly.

She is grating on West Wing staffers and has frustrated  Kelly who has complained that she is just “playing government,” according to CNN.

CNN reports that Kelly believes President Trump’s daughter is trying to have it both ways, serving as a senior adviser to her father one moment and then acting like his daughter the next depending on the situation.

Go Ivanka, drive Kelly out of the White House, you can do it!

-RW 

BREAKING Trump is About to Announce That He is Running for Re-Election in 2020

From Matt Drudge:


I really, really hope there is no "Libertarians for Trump" this time around.

-RW 

Are the Masses Intellectual Cowards?

By Robert Wenzel

At the post, The Greatest Killers, a commenter writes:
We should all own "Death By Government", a powerful tool against the Pelosi's and Schumer's. Arm yourselves for the intellectual battle. But sadly, the truth is, 97% of men are moral and intellectual cowards. Perhaps the hardest lesson I had to learn in life. Nothing as ever caused me to doubt that sad finding.
Although it is not hard to see how some believe this, I would argue that the masses are just not deep thinkers---and it is folly to think they ever will be.

Mises, Hayek and Rothbard always understood the battle for liberty was an intellectual battle. Everyone from Ayn Rand to John Maynard Keynes understood that tomorrow's economic and social mass thinking is based on today's intellectual battles.

Great intellectuals with new ideas who influence what Hayek called second-hand dealers in ideas is the method by which the masses are introduced to ideas. Rand called it a type of osmosis.

Most current social justice warriors, and the masses in general, hold views on equality, "discrimination" and "oppression,"  that were the result of ideas developed by thinkers of the Frankfurt School.  Yet few among the masses have ever heard of the key members of the school such as Herbert Marcuse,·Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin and Erich Fromm--or the school itself.

Whenever I come across someone who holds a very naive Frankfurt school-influenced view  of the world, with little in the way of logical underpinning, but obstinate about his position, I think to myself, "What possible direction will second-hand dealers ever use to cause this man to take on new views?" But yet some second-hand dealers would be capable of doing this.

The battle for liberty is an intellectual battle and a battle for the minds of the second-hand dealers. This is where the battle must be waged, not directly with the masses. The work on the masses is just clean up work, if the battle is won with intellectuals and second-hand dealers.

The big battle as I see it now is between what I call house intellectuals and truth-seeking intellectuals. 

House intellectuals run government, academia and the media. It is difficult to see how any of these sectors will be re-captured by truth-seeking intellectuals anytime soon. Indeed, most often, a truth-seeking intellectual, unless extremely principled with a very strong inner core, will, upon entering these sectors, be captured by the house boys.

But this is where the battle is. The masses aren't intellectual cowards. They are not intellectuals at all. They are not deep thinkers when it comes to social philosophy. They run from intellectual logic because they are not good at thinking things out intellectually and thus they take their guidance from the second-hand dealers. But they are not the problem. If liberty somehow wins at some time the very difficult intellectual battle, and the battle for the minds of the second-hand dealers, the masses will not be a problem. They will be flipped with ease.

Robert Wenzel is Editor & Publisher of  EconomicPolicyJournal.com and Target Liberty. He also writes EPJ Daily Alert and is author of The Fed Flunks: My Speech at the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Follow him on twitter:@wenzeleconomics and on LinkedIn. His youtube series is here: Robert Wenzel Talks Economics. The Robert Wenzel podcast is on  iphone and stitcher.


Spotted at CPAC


Shiva Ayyadurai is a former Republican independent running to unseat Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts. Last June, he sent Warren a DNA testing kit.

-RW 

(via Slate)

Monday, February 26, 2018

INSANE US-Led Coalition Warplanes Strike Syrian Regime Forces

By Tyler Durden


The last time the US-led coalition fighting ISIS in Syria conducted air and artillery strikes against pro-regime forces in Syria, in the oil-rich Deir Ezzor region, was on Feb. 7, when hundreds of pro-regime fighters were killed, the largest number of "pro-regime" casualties inflicted by the US-led coalition in one attack. The coalition described its action as carried out in "self defense", while the Syrian state news agency SANA described the action as an "aggression" by the coalition against "popular forces" who were fighting ISIS and the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces.
In a bombshell update one week later, it was revealed that among the casualties were hundreds of Russian mercenaries working on behalf of the Assad regime, and hired by the Wagner PMC (Private Military Group) - a shadowy organization often referred to as Russia’s answer to Blackwater. Adding to the mystery, is that the Wagner Group is believed to be funded by Yevgeny Prigozhin, a rich businessman close to President Vladimir Putin and also known as "Putin's Chef." Prigozhin was recently sanctioned by the US due to his links to the eastern Ukraine separatists.

Unnamed US intelligence sources quoted by the Washington Post said Prigozhin was in close contact with the Kremlin in the run-up to the Feb 7 assault on the Syrian Democratic Forces base in Deir Ezzor region.
According to the unconfirmed report, intercepted communications showed that Prigozhin was also involved in the operational planning with Syrian officials, ahead of the attack. 
Meanwhile, amid unconfirmed reports that more than 100 Russians had been killed, the Kremlin denied that any regular Russian military forces had been involved. It admitted only that there had been "several dozen" Russian casualties, but gave no further details.
Of course, Prigozhin's name became a fixture in the media in the past two weeks, following the February 16 federal indictment of 13 Russian trolls, including Prigozhin, accusing them of "fraud and deceit for the purpose of interfering with the US political and electoral processes." The indictment said Prigozhin "spent significant funds" on the group and on the Internet Research Agency, a St Petersburg body that has been nicknamed the "Russian troll factory".
Prigozhin shrugged off the US charges, saying "Americans are very impressionable people". "If they want to see the devil, let them see him," he quipped.
* * *
We reminds readers of this extensive back story because moments ago, Al Jazeera reported that less than three weeks after the Feb. 7 US-coalition attack on Syrian pro-regime forces, among them an dozens of Russian mercenaries, the US-led coalition warplanes struck a Syrian regime unit, once again in the northern Deir Ezzor province.
عاجل | مصادر للجزيرة: طائرة تابعة للتحالف الدولي تستهدف موقعا لقوات النظام شمالي دير الزور

So far there has been no further information on the number of casualties or any details of the attack. The question, of course, will be whether any more Russian mercenaries were killed in this latest (targeted) attack by the US-coalition, what prompted the US attack, and how the Syrian military acted in response.
Needless to say, if more Russians were killed - whether mercenaries or otherwise - relations between the US and Russia are about to hit a fresh rock bottom.
The above originally appeared at ZeroHedge.
Jim Ostrowski reacts:

How Real Is Fake News?

Wow, watch this.

This is great reporting by Sharyl Attkisson.  You will be shocked about three-quarters through. And her conclusion is a very important warning.

 

 -RW 

(ht TG)

Trump Privately Talks Up Executing All Big Drug Dealers



Trump is a very dangerous dude.

I have no idea why libertarians are not attacking Trump more aggressively.

For the victimless crime of drug dealing, Axios reports this is Trump's view:
In Singapore, the death penalty is mandatory for drug trafficking offenses. And President Trump loves it. He’s been telling friends for months that the country’s policy to execute drug traffickers is the reason its drug consumption rates are so low.

"He says that a lot," said a source who's spoken to Trump at length about the subject. "He says, 'When I ask the prime minister of Singapore do they have a drug problem [the prime minister replies,] 'No. Death penalty'."

But the president doesn't just joke about it. According to five sources who've spoken with Trump about the subject, he often leaps into a passionate speech about how drug dealers are as bad as serial killers and should all get the death penalty.
Trump tells confidants a softer approach to drug reform — the kind where you show sympathy to the offenders and give them more lenient sentences — will never work.
He tells friends and associates the government has got to teach children that they'll die if they take drugs and they've got to make drug dealers fear for their lives.
-RW 

When the Nazis Took Guns From Jews

Alfred Flatow
By Stephen P. Halbrook

Attorney General Eric Holder told Congress in April about an idea he had directed the Department of Justice to investigate: a requirement that gun owners wear electronic bracelets that would enable only registered owners to activate their firearms. Some critics, focusing on abusive surveillance powers, have called it Orwellian.

But one needn’t look to fiction to be wary: History offers numerous examples of well-intentioned policies to control crime that have had disastrous consequences. In my new book, “Gun Control in the Third Reich,” one particularly horrific case study begins in Germany during the tumultuous early 1930s.

In 1932, Alfred Flatow, the three-time gold medalist in gymnastics at the 1896 Olympics, complied with a gun-registration requirement that Weimar officials hoped would reduce the threat posed by extremist groups. The former athlete dutifully registered three handguns, but this didn’t spare him. The government warned that gun-ownership records must be stored securely so they wouldn’t fall into the wrong hands. It failed to consider that only law-abiding citizens would register, whereas political extremists and criminals would not.

In 1933, the ultimate extremist group, led by Adolf Hitler, seized power and immediately

This Must Be Stopped: Neocons Want To Co-Opt the Term 'Classical Liberal"

Neocon warmonger Max Boot
Neocon warmonger Max Boot wrote this in a Washington Post Sunday op-ed:
In the past I would have been indignant at such attacks and eager to assert my conservative credentials. I spent years writing for conservative publications such as the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Commentary magazine and working as a foreign policy adviser for three Republican presidential campaigns. Being conservative used to be central to my identity. But now, frankly, I don’t give a damn. I prefer to think of myself as a classical liberal, because “conservative” has become practically synonymous with “Trump lackey.”
The neocons have been retweeting this Max Boot line:
 I prefer to think of myself as a classical liberal, because “conservative” has become practically synonymous with “Trump lackey.”
Yet, again libertarians and classical liberals are being outflanked because they are failing to aggressively attack the dumb socialist Trump. What do they see in this guy?

Yes, classical liberals should be against Trump. But the phony neocons, who will attempt to catch any wave if they think they can distort it, as classical liberals is disgusting.

The great historian Ralph Raico (1936-2016) in 2006 for the American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia explained what a classical liberal was:
"Classical liberalism" is the term used to designate the ideology advocating private property, an unhampered market economy, the rule of law, constitutional guarantees of freedom of religion and of the press, and international peace based on free trade.
Got that Max? International peace based on free trade. Not your warmongering ways.

Stay the fuck away.

  -RW 

Cultural Marxism v. Post-Modernism: Which is More Powerful in Destroying Western Civilization?

This is important, find the time to listen to it. I listened to it twice.

For modern conservatives, a question looms large: Has cultural Marxism or post-modernism done more damage to society? Canada's Jordan Peterson claims the latter, while Paul Gottfried -- one of America's most serious paleo-conservative intellectuals, says the opposite. On this week's episode of 'The San Francisco Review of Books on Sunday,' Gottfried explains why he thinks that cultural Marxism is far more serious than post-modernism and what this means not only for America, but Western Civilization.




-RW 

Sunday, February 25, 2018

Shame in San Francisco: American Betrayal at the 1951 San Francisco Peace Conference

Some important history.

 

-RW 

Damore is Wrong: End the NLRB!



Here is a perfect example of how conservatives are just on the right side of the government power spectrum and not necessarily against government power.

James Damore tweets this out.
Notice that the FOX News anchor is also up in arms for Google trying to decreases the power of the NLRB.

Libertarians, of course, should cheer the shrinkage of government always and everywhere.

Go Google!

 -RW 

Oakland Mayor Warns Undocumented Residents of Possible ICE Raids in Next 24 Hours



The battle is joined.

Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf warned residents of possible Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, raids starting “as soon as the within next 24 hours” in a press release issued Saturday night.

In the press release, Schaaf said she learned of the potential operations from multiple credible sources and urged residents to avoid panic and instead to prepare.

“My priority is for the well-being and safety of all residents — particularly our most vulnerable — and I know that Oakland is safer when we share information, encourage community awareness, and care for our neighbors,” Schaaf said in the press release.

Further details of the potential operations, such as precise locations, are still unknown, according to the press release.

What will closed border libertarian separatists say about this, especially since all in Oakland are likely welcomed on the property of US (tax paying) citizens?

 -RW 

Saturday, February 24, 2018

Trump Accelerates US Embassy Move to Jerusalem


Yes, let's rile up the Middle East masses for no good reason.

The US is planning to move its Israel embassy to Jerusalem within three months, pressing ahead far earlier than previously announced, reports the Financial Times.

“We’re planning to open the new US embassy to Israel in Jerusalem in May,” a State department spokesman told FT, adding that the opening will be timed to coincide with Israel’s 70th anniversary.

FT correctly notes:
The move, reversing decades of US policy, will anger many American allies in the region who fear it will stoke unrest and fuel extremism across the Middle East. It is also likely to undermine Mr Trump’s pledge to broker the “ultimate deal” to end the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The status of the divided city is one of the thorniest issues of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Israel regards Jerusalem as its undivided capital and claims sovereignty over the whole city. But most of the international community views East Jerusalem as occupied land and the Palestinians consider it their future capital. No other country has its embassy in Jerusalem.
This completely violates the spirit of the wise guidance delivered by George Washington in his farewell address. He urged the American people to avoid long-term friendly relations or rivalries with any nation. He warned that alliances are likely to draw the United States into wars which have no justification and no benefit to the country beyond simply defending the favored nation. Alliances, he warns, often lead to poor relations with nations who feel that they are not being treated as well as America's allies, and threaten to influence the American government into making decisions based upon the will of their allies instead of the will of the American people.

 -RW

Several Infowars Videos Banned By YouTube

By Robert Wenzel

Infowar's Alex Jones is on the warpath following a CNN hit piece on his network.

The story reports that CNN contacted both Facebook and Youtube and asked the organizations what they were going to do about certain Infowar's videos.

Here is the reaction of Jones. You only need to watch the first one minute and 30 seconds to get the gist.

 

Jones is justified in being angered by CNN's antics.

 According to CNN, YouTube will ban The Alex Jones Channel outright if two more videos receive strikes within the next three months---and CNN is pushing to have more videos reviewed.

Setting aside the specific content of the Infowars videos, the removal of videos, or worse a channel, is censorship. YouTube and Facebook are private organizations that can do whatever they want but it should be understood that Big Internet is no friend of all out discussion and reporting. And Big Internet is getting more and more aggressive in patrolling and removing what it deems unacceptable.

This is a particular problem for those who hold non-conventional views. Those who post such views need to know the limits of what they can get away with at these platforms.

As I have said before, these platforms need to be used only as teasers to drive traffic to our own sites.

Big Internet is not our friend. There is a tendency for Big Internet to be filled with lefties, who have no moral limits on stopping what they see as unacceptable commentary or reporting. Big Internet also likely has subtle, and perhaps not so subtle, pressure from the government to police unconventional views. Be aware.

Robert Wenzel is Editor & Publisher of  EconomicPolicyJournal.com and Target Liberty. He also writes EPJ Daily Alert and is author of The Fed Flunks: My Speech at the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Follow him on twitter:@wenzeleconomics and on LinkedIn. His youtube series is here: Robert Wenzel Talks Economics. The Robert Wenzel podcast is on  iphone and stitcher.

Take Every Penny The Broward County Sheriff Deputy Four Have



By Robert Wenzel

We now learn that while the shootings at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in  Parkland Florida were taking place, four Broward County Sheriff’s deputies hid behind cars instead of entering the high school and confronting the killer, Nikolas Cruz.

Yes, four deputies who pledge to "protect the people" failed miserably in protecting high school youth and school personnel. This is a remarkable dereliction of duty.

Indeed, sources from Coral Springs, Fla., police department tell CNN that when its officers arrived on the scene on the day of the shootings, they were shocked to find three Broward County Sheriff’s deputies behind their cars with weapons drawn.

The Coral Springs cops entered the building to engage the shooter on their own, before other Broward County deputies arrived, two of whom joined the police inside, the sources said.

Coral Springs City Manager Mike Goodrum confronted Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel during a vigil for victims the next day, saying students could have been dying in the school while the deputies held back.

The next day, Coral Springs Police Chief Tony Pustizzi wrote in an internal e-mail that “another agency has given the impression that it had provided the majority of the rescue efforts.”

“Please know that this issue will be addressed, and the truth will come out in time,” he wrote.

Most outrageous, the school’s armed resource officer, Broward County Sheriff’s Deputy Scot Peterson, was among those outside. He resigned on Thursday after his failure to act was publicly revealed. Here's the thing, he retires with his full pension benefits.

It is instructive to consider what would happen if this occurred in a Private Property Society. First, it would be recognized that protection officers that failed to protect broke a contract. No one is forcing anyone in a PPS to join and take on the dangerous work required a protection service personnel but if one does there would be obligations to actually protect.

No one breaking such a contract would have the option of retiring with full benefits, he and his security firm would most likely be sued for every penny they had, perhaps after a trial thrown in jail or maybe hung high.

Will this occur with a government police force? Highly unlikely, they protect their own first, not the people.

Robert Wenzel is Editor & Publisher of  EconomicPolicyJournal.com and Target Liberty. He also writes EPJ Daily Alert and is author of The Fed Flunks: My Speech at the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Follow him on twitter:@wenzeleconomics and on LinkedIn. His youtube series is here: Robert Wenzel Talks Economics. The Robert Wenzel podcast is on  iphone and stitcher.

VIDEO Ayn Rand - Johnny Carson Interview 1967

A powerful interview.

 

 -RW

Friday, February 23, 2018

Trump Sets Date for Military Parade



The president has directed the Department of Defense to organize a parade that would take place on Nov. 11 – Veterans Day – according to an unclassified Feb. 20 memo written by National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, reports Politico.

I wonder if Libertarians for Trump will be along the parade route cheering.

They could wear this T-shirt:





 -RW