The Center for Disease Control is run by con artists and sociopaths.
Wow. WOW. @cdcgov only wants to examine post-vaccine infections with a PCR threshold of 28 or under.
— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) April 29, 2021
That standard ignores 90+% of #Covid infections. The entire epidemic would have looked very different if it had been used.
"An RT-PCR Ct value ≤28"https://t.co/4G18gK8HGg
This compares with a threshold of 40 last year.
and this:
-RW
Before the vaccines, the incentive was to maximize the number of "cases" to maximize the level of hysteria. With the vaccines, the incentive is to minimize the number of "cases" to convince the rabble that the vaccines actually work.
ReplyDeleteYes, exactly. Let's point out that the lowered cycle threshold is for testing people WHO HAVE HAD THE "VACCINE". Of course, this will skew the results to make it look like the "vaccine" is working. It's not a vaccine, by the way.
DeleteI guess the old Ct standard of 40 is still in play for those who have not had the jab...?
Very concisely put. I'm going to quote you when I post this story on the internet.
DeleteFlim flam amn
ReplyDelete"Post-vaccine" at Ct=28, unvaccinated still at Ct=40. Did I get it right?
ReplyDeleteGrading on a curve.
ReplyDelete"Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
ReplyDeleteclinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory"
Labs memtioned are able to genetically sequence a virus?
From the CDC document:
ReplyDeleteCOVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation
Case definition
A person who has SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on respiratory specimen collected ≥14 days after
completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine.
Specimen selection
o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.
This could be taken as a directive to run all PCR tests with 28 or fewer cycles, but if a second PCR test can be done on the same sample, then it might not be. More information on this is needed before concluding what the previous commenters assume.
Of course none of this obviates the problematic nature of PCR tests as diagnostic for a disease or indicative that one is contagious. The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, told us not to use PCR for diagnosing disease, and Fauci has told us that a cycle count over 35 produces useless results at the same time the government advised using a count of 40, clearly abuse of this technology. So it would not be surprising if cycle counts are lowered in these or all cases.
Yet more confirmation:
ReplyDeleteCaught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx'd
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/caught-red-handed-cdc-changes-test-thresholds-virtually-eliminate-new-covid-cases-among
"The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.
"Consider…
" Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.
" Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.
" Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either. ..."
"... To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all."