Monday, January 4, 2016

The Case for Hillary (Again)

There are no good presidential candidates. None.

The oppression will expand regardless of who is president. To the degree it matters, under these conditions the candidate that is hated the most by a large section of the masses is the best option (though it's far from a great victory). More impediments and harassment of such a person as president will occur than if we have a president that has a very vocal and enthusiastic following. That kind of person can really expand the oppression.

Thus, Hillary continues to be the best option in my view because she will be least effective at getting her agenda advanced. Make no mistake, she will be evil and it will be no fun living under her rule, but there will be strong political opposition. An opposition that libertarians can use to their advantage by offering the unthinking masses libertarian justifications for why Hillary is evil.

Robert Ringer, though not necessarily attempting to advance my point, does a good job of expressing the wonderful Hillary hate that does exist:
Bubba is a world class con man, to be sure, but Hilla the Hun is a rank amateur.

In fact, I would have to say that she has less credibility than any politician I can remember — and that’s saying a lot, considering the fact that most politicians hover near zero when it comes to that trait. Surely, Hillary’s handlers must wince every time she opens her mouth — especially when she talks about things like love, kindness, and the “war on women.”

That’s why it’s always puzzled me that so many people seem to believe Hillary is invincible. My take on her is that she is so inherently wicked, so corrupt, so vicious, such an outlandish liar, and such a transparent fraud that anyone short of Ronald McDonald, Mitt Romney, and Mush McCain could KO her with one verbal punch.
What a great endorsement!

   -RW

8 comments:

  1. Looks like I will be exercising my right to not vote yet again. Hillary might be the best strategic choice but I can't bring myself to vote for her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good. This is exactly the kind of thinking I want to see develop around Hillary. Don't vote!

      Delete
  2. I don't know, RW. I understand your point, but hell, Obama is despised by many and he has been a beaming success pushing his agenda through. And the Hidebeast is as big a warmonger as anyone. I'd rather be taxed less while the nation is being destroyed than taxed more.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, Hillary will be the best to make people hat the govt, but I'm not optimistic that conservatives are about to become libertarians. We have had 8 years of Obama, and what have they learned? That Mexicans are causing our economic problems and that Muslims are collectively guilty and we must bomb and kill more of them. They are just as idiotic and barbaric as always.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think we're drifting too far rightward. Some "libertarian" endorsements of Trump really highlight that. A Republican presidency could help us reach some people on the left when libertarians are reminded how bad Republicans are.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I disagree. Trump is the most anti-war candidate at the moment, and the endless wars are my #1 issue. Hillary might bring us World War 3, and at a minimum will cause immense human suffering.

    How many people do you think it is worth Hillary killing to somehow discredit government in the abstract, RW? A simple number would do. How many lives is it worth?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump has been flip flopping on war. I have no confidence that he won't secretly go around the world killing people with drones without regard to civilian casualties.

      Delete