In Feb, Trump said Goldman had "total control over" Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz. Now Trump admin includes Goldman alums Bannon and Mnuchin— Rebecca Berg (@rebeccagberg) November 29, 2016
In Feb, Trump said Goldman had "total control over" Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz. Now Trump admin includes Goldman alums Bannon and Mnuchin
Not sure who the "suckers" are: Does Wenzel suggest that those who didn't vote for Hillary Clinton instead are the "suckers?" Or is it that anyone who didn't not vote is a "sucker?" So if one voted that makes them a "sucker?" But whether the 5 Libertarian Anarchists voted or not voted we would still be here so its odd who Wenzel is so upset at. Did any libertarian who voted for Trump do so because they thought the anarcho-utopia was going to be brought into existence on Trumps first day of presidency and all cabinets would be abolished? Most libertarians in the Rothbardian tradition vote for a politician, if they vote, to take a side on a big issue that may be better relative to the opponent - like the possibility of increased detente in foreign policy relative to clinton. No libertarian who voted for Trump did so thinking the Rothbard Ghost would be elected head of the federal reserve and then be suicidal when it doesn't happen. This whole blog is one big cry-baby. If you think you are going to convince libertarians who voted for trump that they should've voted for Hillary, or to be disappointed in themselves and guilt-shamed because they didn't refrain for casting a vote at all, you are hopelessly delusional. Walter Block +1Wenzel -1
Re: Anonymous,─ Not sure who the "suckers" are: Does Wenzel suggest that those who didn't vote for Hillary Clinton instead are the "suckers?" ─No, only those who voted for El Trumpo because "he will drain the swamp" and "deliver us from Neo-cons." The jury is still out whether the knuckle-draggin' and economically illiterate Build-The-Wallers are suckers, too.─ No libertarian who voted for Trump did so thinking the Rothbard Ghost would be elected head of the federal reserve ─No one knows why they voted for El Trumpo since El Trumpo's policies are antithetical to libertarianism to the point of awe. I suspect they did because of his promise to protect everyone from Mexican butt-sex by building a moat in the continental platform, or something or other.
I voted for Trump because he is likely to be less dangerous than Killery, who is certainly a psychopath, a criminal mastermind, a compulsive liar, a spectacular hypocrite, a world class warmonger, a vicious gun grabber, an awful shrew, an obnoxious harpy and to quote The Donald "a nasty woman".I have to also admit that the prospect of millions of SJW, leftard, snowflake heads exploding in response to his election was too magnificent to pass up. Watching the leftwing lunatic fringe and all of the MSM talking heads lose their minds over his election has been a truly entertaining spectacle. It's going to be a fun 4 years watching from the sidelines as he trolls them endlessly while they foam at the mouth and speak in tongues.
You didn't vote for Hillary Clinton?? You are a duped, low IQ "sucker!" More importantly, I bet "you're an F N white male!"
The suckers are the libertarian "hope & change" Trump fans who thought anything good was coming out of Trump.
I suppose the choice was between war with a nuclear power Russia (HRC) or war with a allegedly nuclear power wannabe Iran (Trump). Hmmmm.
No need for the gnashing of teeth. The GS people didn't fund his campaign and he is their boss.
Fuck it. I don't care anymore. Goin' back to the Bahamas in Jan. Find an empty island and get right with god. (again).
Can I come too?
God. You are in this world but not limited of this world. Your true citizenship is in the Kingdom of God.
Yes. Libertarians destroyed their own brand, not Trump. Molyneux put it succinctly: just a bunch of pot head burn outs. They should join the Bernie Bro Cucks.