Thursday, October 1, 2020

Bob Woodward as An Apologist for the Marxist BLM

Bob Woodward

 What is with Bob Woodward?

Does he hate President Trump so much that he will distort anything or is his wing of the Deep State in league with the Marxist BLM?

Woodward wrote this in his new book about Trump titled Rage (p.375):

The next day, in the White House speech, Trump had said that like the American Heroes who defeated the Nazis, "We are now in the process of defeating the radical left, the Marxiss, the anarchists, the agitators, the looters."

I said there were no Marxists left.

"No," Trump said, "that's wrong, Bob. Black Lives Matter, what they do is they literally have it in their website that they're Marxists."

One of the co-founders claimed in 2015 the she and other organizers of Black Lives Matter were "trained Marxists." It was not, however, on their website. The Black Lives Matter phrase has been adopted as a reformist slogan by the broader social movement for racial justice. 


What the hell is this?

It was stated on the website that BLM founder Opal Tometi was a student of the Marxist leaning Liberation Theology and her practice, according to the BLM website, is in the tradition of Ella Baker and informed by Stuart Hall. 

Hall was a Jamaican-born British Marxist sociologist and political activist. He was founder of the New Left Review and was closely associated with the journal Marxism Today.

The memoir written by founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors has a foreword by the Marxist Angela Davis.

I could go on.

Why is Woodward playing down the obvious Marxist influence at BLM?

Woodward has influence.  Six hundred thousand copies of his book were sold in the first week.

Why is he putting this kind of coprolite out?

-RW

7 comments:

  1. Because Marx won. He doesn’t want to be shot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm gonna call BS on that whole "conversation." No way Trump is that concise and erudite.

    ReplyDelete
  3. “Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?”

    ReplyDelete
  4. Learn more about who Woodward really is.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bob who? And why should anyone care about what that journalist windbag (I know I'm repeating myself) spouts?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think the answer to the "why" question is simple. Woodward is a neocon. The neocons and their predecessors were only "anti-communists" because the Cold War suited their Big Government / Military Industrial Complex agenda. So they were "anti-communists of convenience". They are happy to kneel to marxism-leninism now - because BLMarxism - is useful to Big Government (more socialism) and even the MIC. It is a convenient camouflage to remove Trump. Trump is not really anti-MIC, he is just an unreliable ally because of his "character flaws". MIC related enterprises have no problem buying into Woke. Just look at the UK merchant of death BAE Systems - https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1094715333028601856

    ReplyDelete
  7. Is Woodward a neocon? At the very least - as Scott Ritter describes him - he has a "military messiah complex" - see https://www.rt.com/op-ed/500882-military-messiah-syndrome-trump-woodward-rage/.

    ReplyDelete