I have no idea if Rothbard would have
supported Trump. You can really make a case either way. Murray really jumped around politically. He once supported Bobby Seale and Huey Newton.
But I see no reason to support Trump. He is about as libertarian as Al Gore.
He does know how to rile up the redneck masses against the establishment but he is not doing that in a manner that will lead to more freedom.When it comes to Trump, it is about economic nationalism, in the worst sense of the term, and an infatuation with the police and the military. But, some Rothbardians cheer on Trump which strikes me as a major strategic error. It is just too easy, with justification, to paint Trump as boorish, a liar, with some dog-whistling to racists, and who is out to protect his crony friends and that is all.
It is really diluting the Rothbard brand when Rothbardians support such a President. It provides lefty libwaps, beltarians, and other Rothbard haters the ammunition they desire to attack Rothbardians.
When Rothbardians support Trump, it makes Rothbard unattractive to many, especially the young. And the libertarian infiltrators will take advantage of that to spoil the Rothbard name and move opinion in a more interventionist lefty direction.
It would be different if Trump was principled and desirous to support freedom. Then it would make sense to support him, at least on the freedom issues he held, but Trump has no principled desire for freedom on any topic.
It is time that all Rothbardians not only stop supporting Trump but to viciously attack his interventionist policies. It will better to highlight what Rothbardiansim is about and take a weapon out of the hands of the Rothbard haters, then to support Trump simply becasue he gets the rednecks riled up.