Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Who Needs Assange? Guciffer 2.0 Just Dumped a New Batch of Alleged Clinton Foundation Financial Docs

This looks hot if true:

From the Guccifer page:

 Many of you have been waiting for this, some even asked me to do it.
So, this is the moment. I hacked the Clinton Foundation server and downloaded hundreds of thousands of docs and donors’ databases.
Hillary Clinton and her staff don’t even bother about the information security. It was just a matter of time to gain access to the Clinton Foundation server.
Here’s the contents of one of the folders that I got from there
folder
As you can see, the private server of the Clinton clan contains docs and donors lists of the Democratic committees, PACs, etc. Does it surprise you?
Here are some docs for example
master-west-tracker-2-5k-1-1-2010-7-10-2015
Financial corporations’ donations hfscmemberdonationsbyparty6101
hfscmemberdonationsbyparty6101
It looks like big banks and corporations agreed to donate to the Democrats a certain percentage of the allocated TARP funds.
UPDATE

Donna Shalala, president of the Clinton Foundation, says the documents aren’t theirs, and there’s no evidence that the organization’s networks have been breached.

6 comments:

  1. Are Clintons just throwing out obvious "handles" for the Alex Jones / "Alt-Right" to grab ahold of, all of them being fake? Was the "sickness" faked? Seems possible. Are the hacks fake? A folder named "Pay to Play" calls that into question. Who would name a folder that, if that is what one was undertaking? What wouldn't you put past the Clinton/Intelligence conglomerate to come up with? Not sure this line of thinking is true, but if one wanted to make the "kookie" right look kookie, well wouldn't throwing red meat out be one way to accomplish that. Hillary and media are talking about the "bizarre conspiracy theories" being put forth by Alex Jones and the "alt-right".

    That kind of talk very much plays to a certain type of voter. The type of voter likely to vote for Hillary. Maybe it is just too easy.

    Assange promises a data drop, Roger Stone oversells it, Alex loses his mind when it doesn't show up. Who would benefit from this type of scenario?

    Inconclusive, but one must think outside of the box when dealing with this machine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Heck, the "illness" story alone placed the bar so low for Hillary at the first debate that all she had to do was show up and stand there for 90 minutes! All of her adversaries were predicting she couldn't even do that! Psy Ops are deep.

    Again, uncertain that this is what is happening. But skepticism is the chastity of the mind.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is the same as the 'meme' being planted that Trump is too cozy with Russia, with Putin. That the hackers are all Russian related. That Assange is a Russian agent. Therefore any hacks can be attributed to the Russians. Russian agents are trying to subvert a US election.

    "Bizarre conspiracy theories" are being unleashed against Hillary.

    Maybe all of this talk is a carefully implanted meme, that Clinton supporters are predisposed to believe. Given their priorities, if intelligence sources are not planting these memes, then perhaps they should have been. And maybe they are.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Don't give the masses too much credit. They're looking at the headlines. The headlines say The Clinton Foundation is Dirty. The defense is that there's no evidence this is a real leak. Defense is different than a counter. Defense just muddies the waters. This is not good for Clinton, especially as the WikiLeaks docs start to come.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No "thinking outside the box" required with this gang of thieves. Whether its Clinton or Trump or any other politician they are living off the theft they implemented and enforced through politics and government. No need to parse the publications of Guccifer or WikiLeaks or the MSN. Ignore then all because ultimately the source is a gang of dishonest crooks using politics to get away with theft and murder. The more you participate the more they gain legitimacy. Don't participate.

    ReplyDelete