Thursday, December 24, 2015

U.S. Plans Mass Deportation of Illegal Central American Migrants

To stanch the flow of illegal migrants, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is preparing a national operation to deport Central American families in the U.S. who have evaded removal orders, according to a government official with knowledge of the plan, reports WSJ.

Raids by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a DHS unit, would begin in January and target hundreds of families that entered the U.S. illegally and who have ignored a final order to leave the country, said the official. Such an order is issued by a judge in immigration court.

The number of families showing up at the southwest border has begun to swell in recent months as gang-related crime grips El Salvador and Honduras.

Total evil. See Milton Friedman on why illegal immigrants are the best immigrants.

 -RW 



8 comments:

  1. The Bahamas have purged the islands of illegal Haitians over the last year. The golf courses now look like shit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yay for more police state! /sarcasm

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have to say the headline is misleading. The whole intent of this scheme is to politicize, to make the dems look good. For one, why are they targeting "families"? This use of words tugs at your heart strings. Then they say "hundreds" of families. Hundreds out of how many million? What is the point?

    The point is that this is a symbolic move meant to create sympathy at xmas time. This is entirely for show and I fully expect obama to step in and cancel it or else they will flood us with video footage of a dozen terrified people being rounded up. Hell, they will probably be fema crisis actors playing illegals!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Total evil? No Robert, what's evil is allowing people to be demographically replaced in their own homeland. Libertarians really are simpl minded. You all see people only as economic units. GDP, productivity, and good and services is all you see in people. Ask a libertarian why immigration is good and they will say "higher GDP, more goods and services, lower prices" etc, etc, etc. There are other sociological effects associated with mass immigration that you all choose to ignore. And these sociological effects can destroy a society.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think most of us would say it is ok in principle because people should have freedom of movement. That's not viewing as economic units that's viewing them as human beings. The problem is when the state subsidizes it with welfare perks.

      Thinking they could pose a destructive effect on society is simple minded to be honest. The threat to society comes from the fed govt - don't blame immigrants as the cause when they are the effect of a subsidized plan to boost the dem voting lines and lower the western standard of living. If you subsidize something by god you will get more of it!

      Delete
    2. "The threat to society comes from the fed govt "

      Let's try some simple logic.
      Where does the FedGov gets its power from? Answer - the ballot box.

      What happens when immigrants get voting rights? Answer - they have access to the ballot box.

      What happens when people have access to the ballot box? - They vote for their group interests and values.

      Bringing masses of people here does have consequences. People, language, traditions, culture, and most importantly, Identity, does matter. Libertarians view issues mainly in terms of economics. It works well when it is applied to specific in groups but once and in group/out group conflict comes into play, throw your economics out the window. Diversity + proximity = conflict. Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims are all different people with different value scales. What happens when those values conflict?

      Lastly, whatever libertarians like about limited government, the NAP, and other libertarian values, understand that they are derived Northern European people and their traditions. Replace these people and your libertarianism will disappear from the face of the earth. Libertarianism does have an ethnic component to it. In order for self organizing societies to exist, these societies require a high level of internal trust. If there are groups of people who don't trust each other, there will be no self organizing society. When America turns into Brazil, there will be little internal trust. Instead of having limited or no government, what will be required is a authoritarian strong man to keep the various groups from killing each other.

      Delete
    3. "Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Muslims are all different people with different value scales. What happens when those values conflict?"

      Whats your explanation for inter-racial couples? Are they just faking it because they're being paid off by the left?

      "In order for self organizing societies to exist, these societies require a high level of internal trust."

      Sorry I don't buy this, I dont trust random people no matter who the hell they are. Trust is earned not just granted because someone looks like me.

      "If there are groups of people who don't trust each other, there will be no self organizing society."

      This long existed way before anyone started talking about immigration back in 2006. People keeping to themselves isn't a bad thing.

      "Instead of having limited or no government, what will be required is a authoritarian strong man to keep the various groups from killing each other."

      If someone who claims to want limited or no government and then begs for a strongman then they weren't for limited or no government in the first place. They just want their gang of thugs in charge instead of someone else's gang of thugs. This is what the conservative movement is.

      Delete
    4. Interracial relationships are outliers and exceptions to the rule.

      But the rule of humanity throughout history has been intertribal, interethnic, interracial, interrelations warfare. So what about the various ethnic wars in the Middle East? What about the ethnic wars in the Balkans? What about the fighting between Irish Catholics and Protestants? What about the racial gangs in the American prison system? What about Black people being run straight outta Compton by Latinos?

      http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/25/local/la-me-0126-compton-20130126

      Homogenous societies are peaceful and well ordered. Non-homogeneous societies are full of ethnic/racial/religious strife. Which do you choose?

      Delete