Thursday, April 29, 2021

New PCR Thresholds Set by the CDC


The Center for Disease Control is run by con artists and sociopaths. 

This compares with a threshold of 40 last year. 

and this:


 -RW

8 comments:

  1. Before the vaccines, the incentive was to maximize the number of "cases" to maximize the level of hysteria. With the vaccines, the incentive is to minimize the number of "cases" to convince the rabble that the vaccines actually work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, exactly. Let's point out that the lowered cycle threshold is for testing people WHO HAVE HAD THE "VACCINE". Of course, this will skew the results to make it look like the "vaccine" is working. It's not a vaccine, by the way.

      I guess the old Ct standard of 40 is still in play for those who have not had the jab...?

      Delete
    2. Very concisely put. I'm going to quote you when I post this story on the internet.

      Delete
  2. "Post-vaccine" at Ct=28, unvaccinated still at Ct=40. Did I get it right?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Some COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough cases will have SARS-CoV-2 sequencing performed at a
    clinical, public health, or commercial reference laboratory"
    Labs memtioned are able to genetically sequence a virus?

    ReplyDelete
  4. From the CDC document:

    COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation

    Case definition
    A person who has SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on respiratory specimen collected ≥14 days after
    completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine.

    Specimen selection
    o Clinical specimens for sequencing should have an RT-PCR Ct value ≤28.

    This could be taken as a directive to run all PCR tests with 28 or fewer cycles, but if a second PCR test can be done on the same sample, then it might not be. More information on this is needed before concluding what the previous commenters assume.

    Of course none of this obviates the problematic nature of PCR tests as diagnostic for a disease or indicative that one is contagious. The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, told us not to use PCR for diagnosing disease, and Fauci has told us that a cycle count over 35 produces useless results at the same time the government advised using a count of 40, clearly abuse of this technology. So it would not be surprising if cycle counts are lowered in these or all cases.

    ReplyDelete