Friday, April 3, 2020

What You Don't Know About Dr. Tony Fauci

Anthony Fauci
Dr. Peter Duesberg is a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California at Berkeley.

He is a pioneer in retrovirus research and the first scientist to isolate a cancer gene. He has been a recipient of an Outstanding Investigator Grant from the National Institutes of Health.

He has had a long-running battle with the medical establishment over HIV and AIDS. In 1996, he wrote a book, Inventing the AIDS Virus, where he discusses his battle, the techniques used by his opponents in promoting their view of the cause of AIDS and their aggressive attempts to block out, in the media and elsewhere, his perspective.

President Trump's COVID-19 adviser, Tony Fauci, plays a feature role in Duesberg's book and it pays to revisit the book now given Fauci's latest notoriety and his seeming strong influence over President Trump and his COVID-19 policy.

Below are snippets from the Duesberg book. Keep in mind the book was published 24-years ago, although it seems not much had changed in Fauci's coziness with the media and his modus operandi of shady data claims and shady science.

He learned his domineering "damn the science play to the media" from Robert Gallo:
 The announcement was made prior to the publication of any scientific evidence confirming the virus theory. With this unprecedented maneuver, Gallo's discovery bypassed review by the scientific community. Science by press conference was submitted for the conventional process of scientific validation which is based on publications in the professional literature...
The only questions to be studied from 1984 on were how HIV causes AIDS what can be done about it. The scientists directing his search, included Robert Gallo, David Baltimore and Anthony Fauci, had previously risen to the top of the biomedical research establishment as experts on viruses or contagious diseases. Naturally the virologist chose to employ their familiar logic and tools, rather than dropping their old habits to meet new challenges when AIDS appeared in 1981.
And make no question, even back then Fauci was thought of as an establishment power broker:
Both [Sam Broder and Fauci] were power brokers of the AIDS establishment to whom [Joseph] Sonnabend had finally become acceptable.
It appears that Magic Johnson ditched Fauci advice after it made him sick:
 In November 1991, Magic Johnson proved to be HIV-positive when he applied for a marriage license. Magic was totally healthy, until AIDS specialist Anthony Fauci from the NIH, David Ho, now director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS research center in New York, and Magic's personal doctor advised AIDS prophylaxis with AZT. Magic's health changed radically within a few days. The press wrote in December 1991: "Magic seeing his worst nightmare comes through - - he's getting sicker." Only after he began taking AZT did Magic's health begin to decline...but then suddenly Magic's symptoms disappeared--and so did all the news about his symptoms and treatment... Magic responded to a teacher that "he had been taking AZT for a while, but had stopped." The media preferred not to mention the news.
Fauci did some shady renaming to keep his AIDS theory strong:
 The literature includes more than 4,621 clinically diagnosed AIDS cases that are all HIV-free. To cover up the discrepancy with the overwhelming correlation, HIV-free AIDS cases were renamed in 1992 as idiopathic CD4 lymphocytpenia cases by the CDC and Anthony Fauci.
And then there was the Fauci BIG lie:
But even four years after its approval for human consumption, Anthony Fauci, director for AIDS research at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, stated to the New York Times "ddI has never been compared with a placebo in a large study."
And the BIG Fauci misleading boast:
 Fauci's own Nature paper, boasting large amounts of virus in AIDS patients, actually analyzed just three patients who showed only tiny amounts of dormant HIV genes, even in the lymph nodes, and no infection virus at all.
Here's Fauci as the behind the scenes media operator:
The story repeated itself twice with the Cable News Network (CNN). The second time, for example, a film crew flew out to interview Duesberg, planning to broadcast a half hour special during the 1991 International AIDS conference in Italy. Once again the show was killed at the last minute, and a shorter version only a couple of minutes long reached the airways long after the conferences were over.

A similar plan to interview Duesberg  by a national Italian television was also killed during the conference. One of the "killers" proudly identified himself in a letter to Nature: "Refuse television confrontations with Duesberg as Tony Fauci and one of us managed to do at the opening of the VIII International Conference on AIDS in Florence."

The Larry King program, carried on CNN, scheduled a half-hour satellite interview with Duesberg for August 6th 1992. Suspicious that something might have gone awry Duesberg called the producer a few hours before the live broadcast. Sorry, she told him something urgent had just come up regarding the election. Duesberg turned on the television that evening discovered that he had been replaced not by an election issue, but by Fauci and the president of AMfar... On April 4th 1994 Duesberg got a second chance to make his case on national television. This time it would be on Ted Koppel's Nightline, which had promised it would be Fauci proof...But when the program finally aired in a few months after taping, there was Fauci again. After 15 minutes for the dissidents... Fauci took over the balance of the time debating Root-Bernstein live on co-factors for HIV. Clearly, Fauci proves to be a faithful stand in for Duesberg-AIDS television programs, and he certainly can be counted on when it comes to AIDS thought control.
And most despicable here is the breakdown of Fauci testing pregnant women with a dangerous drug (He used heroin-addicted pregnant mothers)  and then proclaiming the testing a success before the full original trial was completed as planned. Lancet exploded over this dangerous and shady operation
A second more disturbing announcement reached the public in the summer of 1989. NIAID, the NIH division under Anthony Fauci, declared it would be conducting trials of AZT in pregnant mothers infected with HIV. A drug that interferes with growth can lead only to physical deformities in babies developing in the womb...However to prescribe a known mutagenic drug to a pregnant woman was a risky departure from the foremost medical principle, “First, do no harm.”...

In February 1994, Fauci’s American-French trial on pregnant woman was abruptly terminated. Fauci  and his collaborators claimed victory because AZT had reduced “material HIV transmission rate by 2/3” --- from 25% without treatment to 8% with AZT treatment... [But] In view of the possible genetic damage from AZT, Fauci acknowledged “long-term follow up of all of the essential to learn more about the risks and benefits beyond their encouraging results.”...

After declating victory against HIV transmission, the double-blind trials were officially broken prematurely and AZT was offered to all mothers...
An editorial in Lancet did not share Faucet’s optimisim: “The most worrisome aspect is the possibility of long-term adverse effects of children exposed to Zidovudine (AZT) during fetal life, especially since the vast majority wouldn’t have been infected anyway.”



  1. t's a fact, not arguable, that UN-WHO-Gov-especially the MSM used a false comparison of Flu vs Covid. Fact, period. They repeated the Covid death rate using number tested positive divided by deaths = death rate. Then they loudly compared it to Flu rates which is ESTIMATED CASES(in the many millions) + number tested positive divided by deaths = death rate. An inapplicable comparison at best, a blatantly false and manipulative comparison at worst, period. The death rate as compared to the flu is unknown because nobody has provided an estimate of 'estimated covid cases'. Until such time there is a proper estimate of Covid cases, comparing Covid and Flu death rates is an MSM classic move of 'whatever number fits the narrative'.

    To those of us paying attention, we already knew this was targeting those in a fragile state of health(this article is the third set of data), a state that likely meant their time was unfortunately limited for them (and be sensitive to that, many of us could end up there one day).

    But throwing far more massive amounts of other people under the disease-despair-death bus by tanking the economy was inconceivable. Unfortunately now the MSM has taken over the new gotcha narrative. if you're not for shut down then you are for killing lots of people. Sick and twisted is the MSM mindset (and you see politicans all over the place now with this game).

    Too many people are incapable of processing a number as it applies to national or global numbers. They see the number 6000 and it is beyond their ability to put that into context with the number 330,000,000. That inability plus inculcation through the MSM stating/showing 'death everywhere' (these people now see death continually mentioned all day, every day) and even a hint of contextual comparison to 330.000,000 is gone.

    If the MSM talked about the 3200 cancer and heart disease deaths every day, constantly tallying the numbers, most of these people in the emotion driven masses would be frightened. They would never think/consider 330,000,000 in context of what they were hearing.

    The idea that this was going to take 1 million to 2 million is absurd. No country has shown those rates, no country has come close to those rates(South Korea barely did public shut downs), and if the response to a million+ killer is to keep people indoors)great transmission possibility) but also then focus them into one indoor location where everyone touches many things, the grocery store? The 1 to 2 million deaths were certain to happen.

    1. Keeping people indoors and away from each starts to degrade your immune system!!
      Biology 101!!
      This was and is weaponized for the lefts agenda.
      Not too hard to figure out

    2. Have you heard of Event 201: A Global Pandemic Event, held Oct. 2019 in NY. This pandemic was all well planned in advance.

  2. “Why the worst get to the top”. Chapter 10.

  3. Robert, thank you for bringing this to our attention. It is beginning to make sense. I greatly appreciate all of your efforts.

  4. This is good reading. Like anonymous above, I appreciate your efforts, Robert. Take care of yourself.

  5. Nothing about this guy doesn't scream 'Establishment'.

    I hope I am wrong, but we will look back at this disaster and realize who was behind the curtain calling the shots was right there in front of us the whole time.

    1. Fsuci did appear on CNN and said he doesnt understand why the POTUS has not ordered a national shutdown.

  6. What really has us doomed, is that all of these problems "are indeed the result of human action, but not the execution of any human design" This is the inevitable result of massive economic ignorance. Not only is the libertarian world just focused on complaining about "the bad guys" and how they are oppressing us instead of focusing on the massive economic ignorance that makes such oppression inevitable. Without Hayek and like-minded people who showed that the market order is the result of an evolutionary process instead of our reason or design, we keep focusing on the wrong things...We cant solve a problem of economic ignorance by making it a moral one... MIses warned:

    "The problems involved are purely intellectual and must be dealt with as such. It is disastrous to shift them to the moral sphere and to dispose of supporters of opposite ideologies by calling them villains. It is vain to insist that what we are aiming at is good and what our adversaries want is bad. The question to be solved is precisely what is to be considered as good and what as bad. The rigid dogmatism peculiar to religious groups and to Marxism results only in irreconcilable conflict. It condemns beforehand all dissenters as evildoers, it calls into question their good faith, it asks them to surrender unconditionally. No social cooperation is possible where such an attitude prevails."

    However, for understandable reasons, the tradition, or ideology of looking at the world's problems as the result of evildoers or "the bad guys" still dominates so much thinking that keeps us away from viral economic education.

    Ultimately at a deeper level it is Hayek that explained the true source of our troubles:

    "To understand our civilisation, one must appreciate that the extended order resulted not from human design or intention but spontaneously: it arose from unintentionally conforming to certain traditional and largely moral practices, many of which men tend to dislike, whose significance they usually fail to understand, whose validity they cannot prove, and which have nonetheless fairly rapidly spread by means of an evolutionary selection - the comparative increase of population and wealth - of those groups that happened to follow them. The unwitting, reluctant, even painful adoption of these practices kept these groups together, increased their access to valuable information of all sorts, and enabled them to be 'fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it' (Genesis 1:28). This process is perhaps the least appreciated facet of human evolution." (Hayek, "The Fatal Conceit" p. 6)

    THis is why all the politicians and experts who are seemingly running the economy have no fucking clue and are about to destroy civilization... Again, Hayek is the one that got all this figured out:

    "We have never designed our economic system. We were not intelligent enough for that. We have stumbled into it and it has carried us to unforeseen heights and given rise to ambitions which may yet lead us to destroy it." [(Hayek F. A., 1981, p. 164)]

    With respect to private property:

    "…I am quite convinced nobody invented it for a known purpose, and to me the proof of this is that even now hardly anybody yet understands what the advantages of private property and the market society are." (Hayek essay "Individual and Collective Aims" published in "On Toleration" ISBN 0-19-827529-3)

    1. You are entirely spot on in what you say and quote....

      Jesus also said: "If you try to save your life you will lose it but if you lose your life for my sake you will gain it"

      In other words, by trying to save their lives by destroying the economy that supports them and the society that makes their lives meaningful, those of fatal conceit will end up forfeiting their lives.

      Man was not meant to live in caves and hide away but to, as Hayek quotes from Genesis, go out and be fruitful and multiply.

      There are no "risk free" zones in this world but trust in God underlies it all.

      It is no mere conicidence that the churches that meet are warred against mightly right now....

  7. I read what must have been an essay by Dr. Duesberg back in the 90’s that convinced me that AIDS is not caused by a virus but by life style. In Africa malnutrition has been the main cause. In the US it is sticking unclean objects in your body (through a membrane) on a regular basis as with intravenous drug use and anal sex.

  8. Glad you're bringing this up. BTW, when you write quote Fauci as saying: "ddI has never been compared with a placebo in a large study" you should say what ddI is (an anti-AIDS/HIV drug). Otherwise your point is unclear.

    Bottom LINE the man is a liar and should not be trusted. PERIOD.

  10. Good day, does anyone have direct contact details of Dr. Peter Duesberg. Thank you