Tuesday, October 18, 2016

BREAKING Hillary Fixer Breaks Ranks: I Arranged Sex Trysts For Her — With Men & WOMEN

This is going to be interesting. They are definitely putting on a good show for us this election cycle.

From the National Enquirer.

Will the story gain traction?

Here's how the scandal sheet is promoting it:

Hillary Clinton is a secret sex freak who paid fixers to set up illicit romps with both men AND women!
That’s the blockbuster revelation from a former Clinton family operative who is sensationally breaking ranks with his one-time bosses to speak to The National ENQUIRER in a bombshell 9-page cover story — on newsstands Wednesday.
“I arranged a meeting for Hillary and a woman in an exclusive Beverly Hills hotel,” the man, who was hired by the Clintons, via a Hollywood executive, to cover up their scandals, told The ENQUIRER.
“She had come to the studio to see the filming of a movie in 1994.”
“While I was there, I helped her slip out of a back exit for a one-on-one session with the other woman. It was made to look casual, leaving quietly [rather] that being caught up in the melee … but really it was for something presumably more sordid.”
What’s more, it wasn’t just Hillary’s flings with women that the shadowy Mr. Fix It helped to orchestrate!
Hillary’s former bagman finally confessed to The ENQUIRER just how he helped her to cover up her affair with married lover VinceFoster, too!
The shadowy figure — who provided PROOF of his employment for the Clintons — also revealed 12 fixes he covered-up, including:
+ How Hillary secretly plotted to a counter-attack on Bill’s mistress Monica Lewinsky — via a document buried for two decades!
+ What crooked reporters were on the take from the Clinton camp!
+ How he covered up Bill’s seedy romp with hookers!
+ Which A-list celebrity had a secret affair with Bill during his presidency!
In the bombshell exposé, The ENQUIRER will reveal the fixer’s dossier of smoking gun proof, including 24-years of documents, notes, and journals.


  1. Why do they always run with the sex headlines? Sex between consenting adults isn't big news anymore. Get proof of criminal activity and go with that ffs.

    1. If you oppose Clinton at the ballot box, you need the sex angle to get at those who don't give a rat's about corruption, fraud, felonies, treason etc.

      Of course it's still an open question whether any Clinton supporters will be demoralized by this stuff. But what is not in question is that the elites have been exposed backstabbing each other, and that is a much more serous threat to the integrity of the regime.

    2. Because thats National Enquirer's M.O. which also amazes me how people used to be shocked by the tactics of Gawker, Deadspin, TMZ and the like since NE essentially pioneered this type of stuff.

    3. "Why do they always run with the sex headlines?"

      IMO it's because pols purport to be some bar for "morality" or "leadership" despite the fact that they are some of the worst people in American society generally speaking.

      So on the surface, "Sex between consenting adults isn't big news anymore." isn't quite true in the context that morally speaking most people in the United States find consenting sex between MARRIED adults(outside of their marriage) to be morally repugnant.

      Sure, you have some people with "open" marriages, unhappy marriages, etc.- but far and away culturally speaking it's still considered "immoral" to have sex with people outside your marriage...and so from a political standpoint "leadership" that is not representative of the majority morality(whether you agree or not, I know it's subjective) is "news".

  2. No problem. After all, talking dirty is way worse.

    1. I was going to say that Francisco Torres hasn't commented here, so you must be right.

    2. Re: Jim,

      ─ I was going to say that Francisco Torres hasn't commented here, so you must be right. ─

      I haven't commented yet because I haven't read the piece yet. I don't go commenting on things I haven't read. Besides, how would you know? There's a time lag between posting and approval, so don't say thing you don't know anything about.

    3. Re: Dominick,

      ─ No problem. After all, talking dirty is way worse. ─

      Yeah, "talking dirty". Trumpistas are silly.

      There's now SIX women coming out accusing El Trumpo of being a lecherous lout and a sexual batterer. One of them, the reporter from People magazine, has six corroborating witnesses. El Trumpo was nice enough to calm everybody out by assuring he won't sexually batter any woman he finds unattractive. thumbs up!

      Don't forget to clean your ears from all that sand when you get your head out of it.

  3. I think it's been proven that the press is on Hilary's side. If people think she'll win, then it'd be really stupid to cross her at this point. Why take that chance?

    1. I was thinking about your exact point when Trump told her she'd been in jail if he was President, I actually thought "Wow, that's a stupid thing to say to someone who has a good chance of beating you and then can use the same power against you."

  4. If they produce documentation on Hillary's attacks on Bill's "victims", it will be difficult for Clinton given her attacks on Trump.

    The Wikileaks releases seem to also be going from least-provocative to most-provocative, so the October surprises may intensify.

  5. I'm guessing it is Larry Summers.

    1. I blew that one. I meant to say Larry Nichols. LOL.

  6. Replies
    1. Re: Heath,

      Well, the N.E. has been right a couple of times - but only a very few. The problem is that they're not saying anything people don't already know. That Clinton is vindictive? Oh, man! What a revelation! That she had affairs, with WOMEN even? Come on, that turns her into a modern Eleanor Roosevelt but hardly a big shocker. El Trumpo not only says he would like to grab women by their p...y but also practices what he boasts about. But, rest assured, women should sigh in relief because he won't touch you if he feels you're unattractive. He implies as much himself. Isn't his stup.... I mean, his candor, so endearing?

      Also, I don't know who is the senior editor of the N.E. but when I read this in the lead: "The shadowy figure — who provided PROOF of his employment for the Clintons [...]" I had to wonder: Does ANYBODY in the N.E. understand the meaning of the adjective "shadowy"?