tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post2206646252450540293..comments2024-01-13T07:38:36.064-05:00Comments on Target Liberty: Alex Jones Considering Lawsuits Against Facebook and Washington PostRobert Wenzelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14296920597416905488noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-88598176681483881672016-12-30T17:07:37.495-05:002016-12-30T17:07:37.495-05:00"I wonder if you are willing to punish shareh..."I wonder if you are willing to punish shareholders in other corporations like Lockheed Martin, etc."<br /><br />Is this a rhetorical question? These people are part of the military industrial complex. They shouldn't just be punished financially. They should be on trial for being complicit to war crimes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-91747481616685303122016-12-30T17:04:39.835-05:002016-12-30T17:04:39.835-05:00No private entity has a right to property attained...No private entity has a right to property attained from its pro-active and wilfull cooperation with the government, with the specific intention of furthering their interests at the expense of others.<br />Washington Post is a mouthpiece for the state and as such a conspirator for many of the state's crimes.<br />Corporations, exactly the same. To the degree that they have deliberately Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-48977320681854786732016-12-30T11:45:39.342-05:002016-12-30T11:45:39.342-05:00Will, I agree. This statement confuses me:
"...Will, I agree. This statement confuses me:<br /><br />"From a libertarian perspective, I am against suing corporations to force them to operate in any specific fashion. That said, I also support the legal harassment of government agencies and agents of the government. I consider operations like the Washington Post agents of the government."<br /><br />Perhaps it could be made less so Rick Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11751593125225334255noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-86930030442120046752016-12-30T07:01:59.585-05:002016-12-30T07:01:59.585-05:00I understand that libertarians can criticize priva...I understand that libertarians can criticize private corporations. The part that is not so cut-and-try is whether they can sue a corporation if it has some fuzzy label like "government agent". Walter Block already defended the undefendable libelers and slanderers. Unfortunately he thought it was ok to sue a corporation and cause damage to its shareholders, who should be shielded from Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02514260366241042732noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-9258775569169372532016-12-29T22:01:45.172-05:002016-12-29T22:01:45.172-05:00Will,
This post may lend you a greater understand...Will,<br /><br />This post may lend you a greater understanding of Wenzel's view:<br /><br />http://www.targetliberty.com/2016/11/a-haunting-post-about-twitter.html<br /><br />Could you elaborate a bit on your below comment that "...as a consequence you are confusing people when it comes to libertarian principles. People see acts like this and view libertarians as hypocrites."<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16466930384247466023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-72637202142450165942016-12-29T21:55:42.738-05:002016-12-29T21:55:42.738-05:00As a libertarian - not specifically talking now ab...As a libertarian - not specifically talking now about this case but in general - isn't it ok to sue corporations to act in a specific fashion that is in accordance with an agreed upon contract?<br /><br />Now, specifically: Does business with WaPo and so-called journalistic entities that self-designate as such imply a contract of objective fact based reporting; when in error, to as quickly asUnkownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02675182407046562195noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-48416596467933273362016-12-29T18:02:35.168-05:002016-12-29T18:02:35.168-05:00That may be true, but as a consequence you are con...That may be true, but as a consequence you are confusing people when it comes to libertarian principles. People see acts like this and view libertarians as hypocrites. <br /><br />You are willing to willing to punish shareholders in these corporations. I wonder if you are willing to punish shareholders in other corporations like Lockheed Martin, etc. <br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02514260366241042732noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-14589241648369597682016-12-29T13:44:16.550-05:002016-12-29T13:44:16.550-05:00WaPo and Facebook support aggression against you, ...WaPo and Facebook support aggression against you, your wallet and savings, and foreign countries. They closely align themselves with government policies and often used by government agents. This is more than "connected" - collusion. It's bordering on NGO status. If anything this lawsuit would smack them back a bit.<br /><br />Many businesses that are "connected" do so Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2890852736639676808.post-20824990985472569282016-12-29T10:16:30.895-05:002016-12-29T10:16:30.895-05:00You support aggressions against private property i...You support aggressions against private property if the property owners are connected to the government? This would excuse aggression against a large percentage of what is considered justly held property in the US. <br /><br />Do you consider Facebook a government agent?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02514260366241042732noreply@blogger.com