![]() |
Migrants in Budapest. |
With apparent U.S. foreign policy goals of destabilization in the Middle East and North Africa, is Southeastern Europe next on the list of the Empire?
Why are the massive numbers of Middle Eastern and African migrants streaming into the EU going through tiny Macedonia, which is neither an EU or a Nato member? Why not equally accessible Albania or Bulgaria? Why don’t the migrants just use mainland Greece as a stepping stone for a final boat ride to Italy?
Is it possible smuggler networks are being “influenced by western intelligence”and are being led to believe that the longer route from northern Greece through the Balkans to Budapest is the one most certain of success?
Could it be becasue the longer route leaves EU and Nato member Bulgaria and key U.S. ally Albania relatively undisturbed while delivering a mighty blow to those nations (and, in the case of Macedonia and Serbia, largely Orthodox populations) which have either declined to participate in or have criticized sanctions (Catholic Hungary) against Russia, and all of which hope to participate in Russia’s Balkan Stream gas pipeline project?
Anne Williamson discusses all of this in a must read essay, here.
-RW
Euro Peoples are in full "Cuck" mode right now.
ReplyDeletePaying their obscene Income and VAT Taxes dutifully.
Happy to be bitches of both the U.S. and Israel.
Something like this might awaken them.
Sad to see stuff like this, innocent people who are trying to escape the violent hell that US foreign policy (that the EU went along with) created.
ReplyDeleteRemember Muammar Gaddafi a couple of years before he was overthrown said that he was the only one holding back the migrant tides.
ReplyDeleteAs soon as he made that statement it was as if a memo went out to the effect of "get rid of Gaddafi".